Image - www.sbs.com.au

Image – www.sbs.com.au

Children are being removed because child protection workers cannot tell the difference between cultural norms and emotional abuse. So inadequate in cross-cultural understandings are many child protection workers that they see exclusively from the cultural lens of Anglo-Western settings. This is what the manager of foster care agency, Yorganop, Virginia Dingo, told the Secretariat of the National Aboriginal and Islander Child Care national conference – Family Matters – Kids Safe in Culture, not in Care – in Perth, last Friday.

Ms Dingo’s allegations followed whistle-blower allegations along the same lines by former NSW child protection worker, Debra Swan. Ms Dingo told the forum that the rising numbers of children being removed from their families are in part due to misunderstandings of how Aboriginal people live.

“The Department describes children who have been emotionally abused as presenting as very shy, fearful or afraid of doing something wrong.”

“I know a lot of Black children (that are shy) and it is not because they have been emotionally abused.”

“The Department also describes emotional abuse as children showing extremes in behaviour, who are often anxious or distressed, feel worthless about life and themselves and have delayed emotional development.”

“It is often the result of years of racial discrimination and bullying.”

“Child Protection workers need to delve deeper before they take our children away,” said Ms Dingo.

“It is a mammoth failure in Government policy.”

Former NSW Department for Families and Communities child protection worker, Ms Swan, said that she has seen “the biases, the discrimination, the prejudices, the drive to assimilate Aboriginal people.”

“Towards the end of my time there, my eyes opened up to them and especially after I left I realised how they assimilate us, the Aboriginal workers.”

“The Department may say it has cultural education of its staff but that is not true. What they really have is an ulterior white picket fence vision for everyone. They disregard the fact that Aboriginal cultures are not about white picket fences. They disregard our definition of family. We are not into nuclear families with mum and dad alone at the top. In Aboriginal families, there is the whole village – there is the mum and dad but also the aunties and uncles, the grannies and granddads.”

A Western Australian Aboriginal child protection worker said, “The Department is about their line, and their line is about White workers making all the calls. We, as Black workers are only in there to make up the numbers on the book, to cover their backs that there is equality, but there is not. Child Protection is racist, because it is all assimilation and doing as they say, you speak up as a worker and you’re out of line,” said Ms Swan.

“Why are kids being removed at record rates? It’s not because of neglect, it’s not because of a lack of love, it’s because they are seen as not assimilating.”

I have heard these stories not just from Ms Swan and Ms Dingo but from far too many in every part of this continent I have been to.

Ms Dingo said that “children are being reported as neglected because they were playing on the street without shoes, sleeping on mattresses on the floor, sharing a bedroom with other siblings, living in messy homes or because they had head lice.”

“This is not neglect and not reason enough to be reported.”

“We have heard stories of children being removed from their families because they were being cared for by relatives or there was no food in their parents’ home.” Ms Dingo said that child protection workers did not appreciate the Aboriginal context of “multiple carers”.

Ms Dingo said that child protection workers should allow workers with cultural experience to “apply a cultural lens”.

“Aunties are also the child’s mother and grandmothers play an integral role as providers and teachers of culture and law. So while there may not be food in the child’s mother’s home there will be down the road at an Auntie’s or Nana’s.”

But the Departments of Child Protection and Family Services reject the claims and stated that they consult Aboriginal staff. Well, Ms Swan was once one of the staff. The Departments stated that they “never take children away from their homes unless they are at risk of significant harm.” We are now expected to believe 14,000 Aboriginal children were “at risk of significant harm.”

Ms Swan said, “They have lower thresholds of value judgments when judging our people.”